BREAKING: JB Pritzker Launches Last-Ditch “Hail Mary” Effort to Stop Bears Relocation to Indiana
BREAKING: JB Pritzker Launches Last-Ditch “Hail Mary” Effort to Stop Bears Relocation to Indiana
In one of the most dramatic twists in the decade-long battle over the Chicago Bears’ future, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has launched a last-ditch “Hail Mary” legislative push aimed at forcing the Dallas Cowboys owner-owned franchise to remain in the state. The move comes as the Bears have formally advanced their stadium project in Hammond, Indiana — just 25 miles across the border — and is designed to give Illinois lawmakers one final chance to craft a deal that keeps the team at home.
The governor, who has repeatedly said he does not want the Bears to leave Illinois, has signaled he is prepared to call a special legislative session this summer if the team and lawmakers can agree on legislation. Pritzker’s “Hail Mary” effort involves drafting a hybrid stadium bill that blends elements from two competing proposals that passed one chamber of the General Assembly earlier this spring but died in the other. The goal is clear: offer the Bears the exact incentives they demand while protecting Illinois taxpayers from bearing the full cost.
This development has shocked the sports world and sent shockwaves through Chicago. Season ticket holders, local businesses, and political leaders across both parties are watching closely. If the effort succeeds, the Bears could stay in Arlington Heights or find a new downtown-adjacent site. If it fails, the franchise — which has called Illinois home since 1920 — could become the first NFL team to play home games in a different state.
The Bears’ Bold Shift to Indiana
The crisis escalated on June 5, 2026, when the Bears’ board of directors voted to advance a stadium development project in Hammond, Indiana. Chairman George H. McCaskey and President & CEO Kevin Warren issued a statement declaring that the team was “moving forward with plans to build a world-class stadium” near the Wolf Lake area. An exact site has yet to be selected, but the announcement marked the first formal board-level vote on a Hammond location.
Indiana has offered up to $1 billion in public incentives, including tax breaks, infrastructure support, and a new stadium authority. The state also promised a domed or retractable-roof venue to maximize year-round revenue. Local Hammond officials, including Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr., have hailed the project as a regional economic transformer that would connect Northwest Indiana to Chicago’s South Side.
However, the Hammond plan has faced early political resistance in Porter County. Some local leaders have balked at proposed admissions taxes and increased property assessments that could fund the stadium. This has given Illinois a narrow window to act.
Pritzker’s “Hail Mary” Strategy: A Hybrid Bill and Special Session
On June 23, 2026, Pritzker told reporters he has asked the Bears to “piece together” legislation from the two stalled bills that passed the Senate (37-17) and House earlier this spring. One bill would have allowed municipalities like Chicago and Arlington Heights to create stadium authorities and issue bonds. The other included property tax relief for the team.
The governor’s new playbook is simple but ambitious: the Bears must deliver a specific, viable bill before lawmakers return to Springfield in the fall. If the team provides the missing details — including a final site, cost estimates, and a revenue-sharing agreement — Pritzker will call a special session. He has said he is “happy to call a special session” if Illinois legislators can reach consensus.
This approach marks a significant shift. In the spring session, which ended without a deal, Pritzker defended the decision by stating, “I wasn’t willing to give up billions of dollars of taxpayer money in order to give it to a billionaire-owned team.” Critics, including some Republican lawmakers, accused the administration of prioritizing taxes over the team’s emotional ties to the state.
Arlington Heights vs. Hammond: The Two Competing Visions
The Bears’ preferred Illinois site is the 326-acre former Arlington International Racecourse in Arlington Heights, northwest of Chicago. Purchased in 2023 for about $197 million, the site offers more space for a state-of-the-art domed stadium, retail, hotels, and entertainment than any downtown option. Local leaders there have expressed strong support, viewing the project as a massive economic driver.
In contrast, Hammond’s Wolf Lake site is smaller but dramatically cheaper for the state. It would connect the South Side of Chicago with Northwest Indiana through the Loop, potentially drawing fans from both states. NFL relocation rules require significant fan support and market stability, and many analysts believe a move to Indiana would face league scrutiny.
Pritzker’s hybrid bill would aim to offer the same level of incentives the Bears demand in Indiana — tax certainty, bond financing, and development rights — but through an Illinois stadium authority that protects taxpayers.
The Human and Economic Stakes
For thousands of Chicago Bears fans, this is more than a stadium fight. It is about legacy. The franchise has sold out Soldier Field for decades, hosted legends, and been part of Chicago’s identity for 106 years. A move to Indiana would mean playing outside the city for the first time.
Economically, a new Bears stadium could generate thousands of construction jobs, permanent retail and hospitality positions, and hundreds of millions in annual tax revenue. The Arlington Heights proposal alone was estimated





